|
Patton v St. Francis Hosp. Patton had his privileges revoked by
the MEC after a full peer review hearing. He sued for damages and
injunctive relief. The hospital was granted summary judgment under HCQIA.
Patton appealed and lost. The Court stated there was immunity under both
the federal and state laws. The Court used the four prongs of the HCQIA
and stated that a death made the act in furtherance of health care, they
had a year long peer review which showed a reasonable effort to obtain the
facts, the notice and hearing procedures were adequate and that Patton did
not show enough evidence to overcome the presumption that the hospital
believed its actions were reasonable. This last one is an impossible
burden |